Big Idea: Many important practical and mathematical applications involve comparing quantities of one kind or another; it is important to know which method to use and how we should use them.
Essential Question: What methods are there for comparing things.
Problem 6.3
A.How many of the 1000 delegates should be chosen from each of the nine geographic regions?
There are 2 methods to find a fair amount of delegates from each region (I will use both).
Divide the region population by the total (U.S.) population, then multiply your answer by 1000 ((because all of the numbers that we use for the populations have 3 more 0's at the end)
Make a proportion. The region population divided by the total (U.S.) population which equals to delegates from region (X) divided by total # of delegates. Note: Both methods will have same answer
1. 13,207 people (Population of New England) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.053
0.053 multiplied by 1000 = 53.1 rounded(because you cant have 1/10 of a person)= 53 delegates from New England.
2. 37,602 people (Population of Middle Atlantic) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.151
0.151 multiplied by 1000 = 151.1 (rounded)= 151 delegates from Middle Atlantic.
3. 42,009 people (Population of East North Central) divided by 238,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.1759
0.1759 multiplied by 1000 = 175.9 (rounded) = 175 delegates from from East North Central.
4. 17,660 people (Population of West North Central) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.071
0.071 multiplied by 1000 = 71.0 delegates from West North Central.
5. 43,567 people (Population of West North Central) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) =
6. 15,176 people (Population of East South Central) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.061
0.061 multiplied by 1000 = 61.0 delegates from East South Central.
7. 26,703 people (Population of West South Central) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.093
0.093 multiplied by 1000 = 93.7 (rounded)= 94 delegates from West South Central.
8. 13,659 people (Population of Mountain) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.054
0.054 multiplied by 1000 = 54.9 (rounded)= 55 delegates from the Mountains.
9. 38,127 people (Population of Pacific) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.153
0.153 multiplied by 1000 = 153.2 (rounded)= 153 delegates from the Pacific. B. How many of the 1000 delegates should be from metropolitan areas, and how many should be from rural areas?
1. 192,726 people (Population of people living in the metropolitan area in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.77 0.77 multiplied by 1000 = 774.9 (rounded)= 775 delegates from the metropolitan area.
2. 55,984 people (Population of people living in the rural area in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.225 0.225 multiplied by 1000 = 225.0 delegates from the rural area.
C. How many of the delegates should be of Hispanic origin? 22,354 people (Population of Hispanic people in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.089
0.089 multiplied by 1000 = 89.8 (rounded)= 90 delegates from Hispanic origin.
D.Four racial groups are named in the data: White; Black; Native American--Eskimo--Aleut; and Asian--Pacific Islander. How many of the 1000 delegates should represent each of these races (a)? How many should represent the category "all other races" (which is not mentioned in the data) (b)?(a)
(a)
White (method #1) - 199,686 people (Population of the White people in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.802
0.802 multiplied by 1000 = 802.8 (rounded)= 803 delegates from White people
Black (method #1) - 29,986 people (Population of the Black people in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.12
0.12 multiplied by 1000 = 120.5 (rounded)= 121 delegates from Black people
Native American/Eskimo/Aleut - 1,959 (Population of the Native American/Eskimo/Aleut) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.007.
0.007 multiplied by 1000 = 7.8 (rounded)= 8 delegates from the Native American/Eskimo/Aleut people
Asian/Pacific Islander - 7,274 (Population of Asian/Pacific Islander) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.029
All other races would be determined by adding all the races listed, then subtracting them from the total population to see the # of people in the "other race".
White - 199,686
Black - 29,986
N.A./Eskimo/Aleut - 1,959
Asian/Pacific Islander - 7,274+
TOTAL:
238,905 people (in races listed)
To find the remaining people, you would have to subtract the total by the U.S. population.
248,710 people-238,905 people =
9,805 people in the "other race".
E. Use your answers to A-D to help you develop a plan for selecting the delegates. Describe your plan in a report that you could submit to the conference organizers.
Dear the planners of the Environmental Studies Conference, There are 9 regions, 5 races (including the race not included in the data) and 2 areas that the delegates have to be chosen from in the U.S. To make the # of delegates from each criterion fair, you must develop a formula (or method) to pick the right amount. I found 2 ways to find a fair amount of delegates out of 1000 from each criterion. I have found 2 formulas (although I am sure there are many more) that I find easy to use. The first one is to divide the region population by the total (U.S.) population, then multiply your answer by 1000 (because all of the numbers that we use for the populations have 3 more 0's at the end). The second one is to make a proportion. The proportion is made up of the region/race/area population divided by the total (U.S.) population which equals to delegates from region/area/race (X) divided by total # of delegates. You also have to round the end number because you can’t have half or 1/10 of a delegate. The formulas can also be known as method #1 (region/race/area population/U.S. population then multiply by 1000) or method #2 (the proportion). I have used these methods (they have the same results/answers) on different questions in this problem (6.3). They are very effective and the results that they find are accurate. For example for New England, (method #1) would be: 13,207 (Population of New England) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.053 multiplied by 1000 equals 53 delegates chosen from New England. For New England (method #2) the proportion would look like this:
Legend of Proportion: Left top quadrant: Population of region (13,207,000 people) Left bottom quadrant: Population of the U.S. (248,710 people) Right top quadrant: # of delegates from that region (X) Right bottom quadrant: total # of delegates (1000 delegates)
The only flaw in these formulas is the fact that a person is part of a race, area and region, so you would need to get each person from a specific area, region and race to equal out the specifications (found by the formulas). What I am trying to explain is that one person does not just apply in 1 criterion—they are from 1 race, 1 area, and 1 region, which means that you have to choose the middle-schoolers very carefully to equal out the # of delegates needed for that criterion (chosen with the formulas). Other than that, the 2 formulas I think are very useful for any race/region/area in this problem. Therefore, I think that this committee should use these formulas to fairly choose the # of students from each ethnic/region/area. AN
6.3 Follow up
If you could choose another criterion to help choose the delegates to that representation would be fair, what criterion would you add and why?
I would add the grade-level as another criterion (6th grade-8th grade). This is because we need a blend of different grade-level not just all 6th graders or 8th graders. This balance might show that the different grade-levels think differently due to their lack of experience in Middle School (6th graders) or their more experience in Middle School (8th graders). This might show that they think differently. This is why I would add this criterion.
22/01/11
Block-B
Big Idea:
Many important practical and mathematical applications involve comparing quantities of one kind or another; it is important to know which method to use and how we should use them.
Essential Question:
What methods are there for comparing things.
Problem 6.3
A. How many of the 1000 delegates should be chosen from each of the nine geographic regions?
There are 2 methods to find a fair amount of delegates from each region (I will use both).
Divide the region population by the total (U.S.) population, then multiply your answer by 1000 ((because all of the numbers that we use for the populations have 3 more 0's at the end)
Make a proportion. The region population divided by the total (U.S.) population which equals to delegates from region (X) divided by total # of delegates.
Note: Both methods will have same answer
1. 13,207 people (Population of New England) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.053
0.053 multiplied by 1000 = 53.1 rounded(because you cant have 1/10 of a person)= 53 delegates from New England.
2. 37,602 people (Population of Middle Atlantic) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.151
0.151 multiplied by 1000 = 151.1 (rounded)= 151 delegates from Middle Atlantic.
3. 42,009 people (Population of East North Central) divided by 238,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.1759
0.1759 multiplied by 1000 = 175.9 (rounded) = 175 delegates from from East North Central.
4. 17,660 people (Population of West North Central) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.071
0.071 multiplied by 1000 = 71.0 delegates from West North Central.
5. 43,567 people (Population of West North Central) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) =
6. 15,176 people (Population of East South Central) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.061
0.061 multiplied by 1000 = 61.0 delegates from East South Central.
7. 26,703 people (Population of West South Central) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.093
0.093 multiplied by 1000 = 93.7 (rounded)= 94 delegates from West South Central.
8. 13,659 people (Population of Mountain) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.054
0.054 multiplied by 1000 = 54.9 (rounded)= 55 delegates from the Mountains.
9. 38,127 people (Population of Pacific) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.153
0.153 multiplied by 1000 = 153.2 (rounded)= 153 delegates from the Pacific.
B. How many of the 1000 delegates should be from metropolitan areas, and how many should be from rural areas?
1. 192,726 people (Population of people living in the metropolitan area in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.77
0.77 multiplied by 1000 = 774.9 (rounded)= 775 delegates from the metropolitan area.
2. 55,984 people (Population of people living in the rural area in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.225
0.225 multiplied by 1000 = 225.0 delegates from the rural area.
C. How many of the delegates should be of Hispanic origin?
22,354 people (Population of Hispanic people in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 people (Population of the U.S.) = 0.089
0.089 multiplied by 1000 = 89.8 (rounded)= 90 delegates from Hispanic origin.
D. Four racial groups are named in the data: White; Black; Native American--Eskimo--Aleut; and Asian--Pacific Islander. How many of the 1000 delegates should represent each of these races (a)? How many should represent the category "all other races" (which is not mentioned in the data) (b)?(a)
(a)
- White (method #1) - 199,686 people (Population of the White people in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.802
0.802 multiplied by 1000 = 802.8 (rounded)= 803 delegates from White people- Black (method #1) - 29,986 people (Population of the Black people in the U.S.) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.12
0.12 multiplied by 1000 = 120.5 (rounded)= 121 delegates from Black people- Native American/Eskimo/Aleut - 1,959 (Population of the Native American/Eskimo/Aleut) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.007.
0.007 multiplied by 1000 = 7.8 (rounded)= 8 delegates from the Native American/Eskimo/Aleut people- Asian/Pacific Islander - 7,274 (Population of Asian/Pacific Islander) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.029
0.029 multiplied by 1000 = 29.2 (rounded)= 29 Asian/Pacific Islander delegates(b)
All other races would be determined by adding all the races listed, then subtracting them from the total population to see the # of people in the "other race".
White - 199,686
Black - 29,986
N.A./Eskimo/Aleut - 1,959
Asian/Pacific Islander - 7,274+
TOTAL:
238,905 people (in races listed)
To find the remaining people, you would have to subtract the total by the U.S. population.
248,710 people-238,905 people =
9,805 people in the "other race".
E. Use your answers to A-D to help you develop a plan for selecting the delegates. Describe your plan in a report that you could submit to the conference organizers.
Dear the planners of the Environmental Studies Conference,
There are 9 regions, 5 races (including the race not included in the data) and 2 areas that the delegates have to be chosen from in the U.S. To make the # of delegates from each criterion fair, you must develop a formula (or method) to pick the right amount. I found 2 ways to find a fair amount of delegates out of 1000 from each criterion.
I have found 2 formulas (although I am sure there are many more) that I find easy to use. The first one is to divide the region population by the total (U.S.) population, then multiply your answer by 1000 (because all of the numbers that we use for the populations have 3 more 0's at the end).
The second one is to make a proportion. The proportion is made up of the region/race/area population divided by the total (U.S.) population which equals to delegates from region/area/race (X) divided by total # of delegates. You also have to round the end number because you can’t have half or 1/10 of a delegate.
The formulas can also be known as method #1 (region/race/area population/U.S. population then multiply by 1000) or method #2 (the proportion). I have used these methods (they have the same results/answers) on different questions in this problem (6.3). They are very effective and the results that they find are accurate.
For example for New England, (method #1) would be: 13,207 (Population of New England) divided by 248,710 (Population of the U.S.) = 0.053 multiplied by 1000 equals 53 delegates chosen from New England.
For New England (method #2) the proportion would look like this:
Legend of Proportion:
Left top quadrant: Population of region (13,207,000 people)
Left bottom quadrant: Population of the U.S. (248,710 people)
Right top quadrant: # of delegates from that region (X)
Right bottom quadrant: total # of delegates (1000 delegates)
The only flaw in these formulas is the fact that a person is part of a race, area and region, so you would need to get each person from a specific area, region and race to equal out the specifications (found by the formulas). What I am trying to explain is that one person does not just apply in 1 criterion—they are from 1 race, 1 area, and 1 region, which means that you have to choose the middle-schoolers very carefully to equal out the # of delegates needed for that criterion (chosen with the formulas).
Other than that, the 2 formulas I think are very useful for any race/region/area in this problem. Therefore, I think that this committee should use these formulas to fairly choose the # of students from each ethnic/region/area.
AN
6.3 Follow up
If you could choose another criterion to help choose the delegates to that representation would be fair, what criterion would you add and why?
I would add the grade-level as another criterion (6th grade-8th grade). This is because we need a blend of different grade-level not just all 6th graders or 8th graders. This balance might show that the different grade-levels think differently due to their lack of experience in Middle School (6th graders) or their more experience in Middle School (8th graders). This might show that they think differently. This is why I would add this criterion.